Saturday, January 25, 2014

Storytelling



 A major theme that keeps coming up in my Lay Institute class is the concept of how our narrative shapes how we see the world.  We understand everything within the context of the stories we tell ourselves about how the world works, how we ought to be. 

For the past several weeks within that class, I’ve been telling the narrative of science.  The history behind many scientific discoveries, how science and scientists think of themselves and their goals, how science works.  Last Monday I had my father skype in for an interview, and he spent part of it telling the stories of geology, but mostly telling his own story.  Telling his experiences within geology and within the church, and how those stories shaped him into who he was.  With my permission, he also told the class stories about me, so they could see where I came from and what shaped me into the person sitting in that class, teaching in the way I do. 

One of the great things about teaching here in the Philippines is that I don’t have to explain why stories are important, why what we tell ourselves about the world matters in how we see things.  Everyone in my Lay Institute class gets that, gets the importance of story in telling truths.  They’re just as likely to say that the only way to tell real truths is to tell the story behind it, and I can’t disagree there. 

Our Lay Institute classes tend to run long, and to wander into discussions far afield of the original topics as we pursue those stories.  Often it brings us to surprising commonalities, moments of shared traditions between two cultures.  A discussion of Darwinian concepts of evolution turned into thoughts on immigration in the US, and into a history of the Irish immigration in particular, and from there into the similarities in how the Irish were viewed at that time and how Filipinos are viewed today, the parallels and repetitions only strengthening the truths we found. 

Over the course of this next week I’ll have to write a mid-term test to track what we have taught.  But how do I turn the brilliant, dynamic discussions we’ve held into something semi-objective?  No attempt I can come up with will truly track what has been learned here.  I don’t even know for certain everything that I’ve learned in the course of teaching.  But that in itself is its own gift: this class experience will never be summed up in a test and an outline of our course objectives.  It has already succeeded in its true goal of making us all think differently.  And the only way to describe that change?  Is in the stories we will tell from this point onwards.  

1 comment:

  1. We're currently going through an adult forum on "The Jesus Seminar" and the modern quest for the historical Jesus, with varying degrees of success. In my opinion, the material could be presented better with a much better narrative. At the end, I'm not sure where the scientific, historical approach really gets us.

    For the "Historical Jesus" and the "Historical David (in another context)", I'm reminded of the advice of an unnamed political reporter at the end of the movie "The Man who Shot Liberty Valence". If you haven't seen it, an elderly senator (Jimmy Stewart) and his wife return from Washington for the funeral of an old saddle tramp (John Wayne). The Senator has a crippled arm, which he got in a famous gunfight early in his career, when he faced down a notorious outlaw, Liberty Valance, and killed him. That single act of heroism made his social and political career. After the funeral, the reporters from the town corner the Senator and ask him why he came back. For the first time ever, he tells the true story. It seems that the future Senator was a weakling, and unused to guns and got robbed by the outlaw. He got bullied later by the same outlaw, and in despair, he went to face the outlaw, thinking it would be better to get killed than continue living that way. He got shot in the arm, and then John Wayne (who had befriended him) actually took the shot that killed Liberty Valance. The lawyer got the credit, and the love of his wife (who John Wayne had bee courting). The Senator learned the truth from John Wayne, but both he and John Wayne agreed that he would take the credit, in order to defeat the political forces that were holding the territory back. After hearing the true story after the funeral, the reporter ripped up his notes and said "When truth conflicts with the legend, print the legend".

    Sometimes telling the story is telling the truth. Sometimes, we tell the legend instead.

    ReplyDelete